actions-runner-controllervsXibo CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | Xibo CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 6 619 | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +101 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.
Xibo CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, Xibo CMS is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →Xibo CMS details →