# actions-runner-controller vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 6 623 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-wyoming-piper