# actions-runner-controller vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted [CI/CD projects](https://selfhost.directory/cicd), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 8 065 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-woodpecker-ci