actions-runner-controllervsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 35 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +373 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 3 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
web-check is growing faster right now (+373 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →web-check details →