# actions-runner-controller vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 78 682 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +2 025 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 025 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-unsloth