# actions-runner-controller vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-tradingagents