actions-runner-controllervsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+93 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →Text Generation WebUI details →