# actions-runner-controller vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 6 619 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +101 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-scada-lts