# actions-runner-controller vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 6 619 | 13 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +101 ✓ | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-rabbitmq