actions-runner-controllervsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 6 619 | 27 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +101 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 20 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller details →PostgREST details →