# actions-runner-controller vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 92 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +57 711 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-omnivoice-studio