actions-runner-controllervsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 92 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +57 711 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 35 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →OmniVoice-Studio details →