# actions-runner-controller vs netdata

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | netdata |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 81 201 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +567 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

netdata is growing faster right now (+567 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-netdata