actions-runner-controllervsMQTTX Web
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | MQTTX Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 3 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+93 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →MQTTX Web details →