actions-runner-controllervsmotionEye
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | motionEye | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 6 610 | 4 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+93 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →motionEye details →