# actions-runner-controller vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 613 | 46 462 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +96 | +1 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

actions-runner-controller ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-mitmproxy