# actions-runner-controller vs MacOS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | MacOS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #2 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 6 612 | 21 689 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | +115 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

MacOS scores 76/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, MacOS is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-macos