actions-runner-controllervsLanLens
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | LanLens | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 613 | 146 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +96 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, LanLens is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+96 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →LanLens details →