# actions-runner-controller vs grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 623 | 77 588 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 | +695 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 53 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

grafana scores 90/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.

grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, grafana is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

grafana is growing faster right now (+695 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-grafana