# actions-runner-controller vs globalping-probe

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | actions-runner-controller | globalping-probe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 28 in CI/CD | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 617 ✓ | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | ISC |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

actions-runner-controller scores 71/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.

If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.

actions-runner-controller is growing faster right now (+99 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [actions-runner-controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/actions-runner-controller.md)
- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/actions-runner-controller-vs-globalping-probe