# ACE-Step vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ACE-Step | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 14 151 | 35 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 283 ✓ | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 77/100 for ACE-Step, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ACE-Step.

## Details

- [ACE-Step](https://selfhost.directory/project/ace-step) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ace-step.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ace-step-vs-seaweedfs