# ACE-Step vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ACE-Step | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 140 | 20 537 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 283 ✓ | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 77/100 for ACE-Step, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ACE-Step.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; ACE-Step needs more configuration.

ACE-Step is growing faster right now (+1 283 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ACE-Step](https://selfhost.directory/project/ace-step) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ace-step.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ace-step-vs-mediamtx