# abs-kosync-bridge vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | abs-kosync-bridge | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 550 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

abs-kosync-bridge scores 57/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.

## Details

- [abs-kosync-bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/abs-kosync-bridge-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana