# abs-kosync-bridge vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | abs-kosync-bridge | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 20 539 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +287 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.

abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [abs-kosync-bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/abs-kosync-bridge-vs-mediamtx