# abs-kosync-bridge vs LAN-Orangutan

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | abs-kosync-bridge | LAN-Orangutan |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 58/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 1 140 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

LAN-Orangutan scores 58/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.

abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.

LAN-Orangutan is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [abs-kosync-bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge.md)
- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/abs-kosync-bridge-vs-lan-orangutan