# abs-kosync-bridge vs JmalCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | abs-kosync-bridge | JmalCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 882 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

abs-kosync-bridge scores 57/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.

JmalCloud is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [abs-kosync-bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/abs-kosync-bridge.md)
- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/abs-kosync-bridge-vs-jmal-cloud-view