# 3x-ui vs Lantunnel

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | 3x-ui | Lantunnel |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in Network Management | #36 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 48 793 ✓ | 163 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +461 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.11.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.12 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

3x-ui scores 84/100 against 49/100 for Lantunnel, so it is the safer default.

3x-ui ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Lantunnel.

If you want the quickest setup, 3x-ui is easier to run; Lantunnel needs more configuration.

3x-ui is growing faster right now (+461 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [3x-ui](https://selfhost.directory/project/3x-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/3x-ui.md)
- [Lantunnel](https://selfhost.directory/project/lantunnel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lantunnel.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/3x-ui-vs-lantunnel