# 2fa vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | 2fa | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 458 | 114 255 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.13.1 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 48/100 for 2fa, so it is the safer default.

2fa ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, 2fa is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [2fa](https://selfhost.directory/project/2fa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/2fa.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/2fa-vs-supabase