2favssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| 2fa | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 458 | 114 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.13.1 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 48/100 for 2fa, so it is the safer default.
2fa ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, 2fa is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).
2fa details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep 2fa, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with