# 2fa vs Appwrite

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | 2fa | Appwrite |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 458 | 57 786 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +334 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.1 · 19 Oct 2026 | 1.9.10 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Appwrite scores 84/100 against 48/100 for 2fa, so it is the safer default.

Appwrite ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for 2fa.

If you want the quickest setup, 2fa is easier to run; Appwrite needs more configuration.

Appwrite is growing faster right now (+334 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [2fa](https://selfhost.directory/project/2fa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/2fa.md)
- [Appwrite](https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/appwrite.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs coolify](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-coolify)
- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)
- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/2fa-vs-appwrite